Safety Stock Methods

Safety Stock: A Guide from Simple Days-Based Approach to Advanced Calculations 

In any supply chain, the one constant is variability. Whether it’s unexpected spikes in customer demand, delays in supplier lead times, or shifts in market conditions, unpredictability is a reality that businesses face every day. This is where Safety Stock comes in – the inventory buffer that helps safeguard against these disruptions. But how do you decide how much safety stock to hold? 

There are different approaches, ranging from a simple days-based model to more complex statistical methods involving Z-scores and service levels. Both methods have their place, and the right one depends on your business's needs and the variability it faces. 

The Simple Approach: Days-Based Safety Stock 

For many businesses, especially those with a high volume of fast-moving products, a days-based approach to safety stock can be an effective starting point. The basic idea here is to hold enough inventory to cover a certain number of days' worth of sales or usage. 

How It Works: 

  1. Calculate Average Daily Usage: Start by determining the average daily demand for a given item. This could be based on historical sales data over a certain period. 

  2. Determine Safety Stock Days: Decide how many days' worth of inventory you want to hold as a buffer. This might be based on your supplier’s lead time, historical variability, or how conservative you want to be with your stock levels. 

  3. Set Your Safety Stock: Multiply the average daily usage by the number of safety stock days you've decided on. For example, if you sell 10 units per day and want to hold 5 days' worth of buffer, your safety stock would be 50 units. 

Benefits: 

  • Simplicity: This method is easy to calculate and doesn’t require complex software or statistical models. It’s ideal for businesses looking for a straightforward way to manage stock without diving too deep into analytics. 

  • Fast Implementation: You can quickly set safety stock levels based on business judgment and historical data, making it a practical approach when you're just getting started or if you have low variability. 

Limitations: 

  • Lack of Precision: This approach assumes demand is stable and predictable, which may not be the case in many industries. If variability is high, you could end up overstocking or understocking. 

  • Reactive Rather Than Proactive: Since this method is based on past data, it doesn’t factor in future changes in demand, such as promotions, new product launches, or market trends. 

The Advanced Approach: Z-Scores and Service Levels 

For businesses facing more complex or volatile demand, a more sophisticated approach to calculating safety stock is often required. This is where formulas involving Z-scores and service levels come into play. 

How It Works: 

  1. Service Level: This represents the percentage of time you want to be able to meet customer demand without a stockout. For example, if your service level target is 95%, you want to have enough stock on hand to meet demand 95% of the time. 

  2. Demand Variability: You’ll need to calculate the standard deviation of demand during the lead time. This measures how much demand fluctuates over time. 

  3. Lead Time Variability: Factor in variability in supplier lead times. If your supplier occasionally runs late, this needs to be considered to ensure you have enough stock to cover longer lead times. 

  4. The Z-Score: The Z-score corresponds to the service level and tells you how many standard deviations away from the mean you need to be to achieve that service level. For instance, a 95% service level corresponds to a Z-score of 1.645. 

  5. Safety Stock Calculation: Using the formula: 

Safety Stock=Z×σLTSafety Stock=Z×σLT  

Where: 

  • ZZ is the Z-score for the desired service level 

  • σLTσLT  is the standard deviation of demand during lead time 

Benefits: 

  • Greater Precision: This approach allows for a more accurate calculation of safety stock by considering variability in both demand and lead time. 

  • Service-Level Focused: By defining the level of service you want to provide, this method helps ensure you’re meeting customer expectations without overstocking. 

Limitations: 

  • Complexity: This method requires a solid understanding of statistics and reliable data on both demand and lead time variability. For businesses without the necessary data or expertise, it can be difficult to implement effectively. 

  • Data Dependency: The accuracy of the safety stock calculation depends on the quality of your historical data. If your data is incomplete or unreliable, the results could be skewed. 

Which Method Should You Use? 

The right approach depends on the specific dynamics of your business. 

  • If your business operates in a stable environment with relatively predictable demand, the days-based approach might be sufficient. It's simple, effective, and gets the job done without adding unnecessary complexity. 

  • If your business faces high variability in demand or lead times, an advanced approach using Z-scores and service levels will provide a more tailored solution. It allows you to fine-tune your safety stock levels and optimise inventory costs without compromising service. 

Conclusion 

There’s no one-size-fits-all solution to safety stock planning. The key is to find the right balance between holding too much stock (and tying up cash) and holding too little (and risking stockouts). Whether you’re managing inventory with a simple days-based method or using advanced formulas to account for variability, safety stock is essential for maintaining the balance between service levels and cost efficiency. 

As your business grows and changes, so should your approach to safety stock. Start simple, build your understanding, and adapt as you gain more data and insights. And remember, safety stock isn’t about perfection – it’s about protection. 

If you’re unsure where to begin or need help refining your approach to safety stock, I’d be happy to share my experience and guide you through the process. 

 ____________________

Previous
Previous

Sales & Operational Planning

Next
Next

Reactive vs Preventative vs Predictive Maintenance